Great Question
If you get most of your work from attorneys, then Larry Bodine says here you should find your five favorites and ask them;
If you get most of your work from attorneys, then Larry Bodine says here you should find your five favorites and ask them;
Posted by Geoff Sharp 2 comments
Nestled beside a post advising that reincarnating Tibetan Buddhas must obtain Chinese Government approval in future comes this interesting post on Monday over at China Briefing Blog on the growth of mediation in China.
Labor disputes in China are rising quickly with an annual growth rate of 27.3 % - so something needs to be done.
China is looking to deal with the crisis by a bill strengthening mediation so as to 'help fairly solve labor disputes without going to court and thus safeguard employee's legitimate rights and promote social harmony'
Under the bill workplace mediation committees made up of workers and management are to be established to solve disputes at grassroots level.
Sounds like communism.
Posted by Geoff Sharp 0 comments
Labels: mediation news
If Mediate.com is #1 for 'mediation' on Google, guess who is #2?
Well, take a look here.
Wikipedia (wikiˈpiːdi.ə) is the second most visited site from Google searches and, as you would expect from the Internet's largest reference site, the collaborative online encyclopedia includes an extensive entry for mediation.
Posted by Geoff Sharp 0 comments
I know many readers of this blog do so by RSS feed in Bloglines.
You may be interested to read your daily diet of blogs in Blogline's new design launched today at beta.bloglines.com.
Posted by Geoff Sharp 0 comments
Labels: mediation news
In his latest short video gem, Maister digs deep into what it feels like to be on the other side of the fence - to be the buyer of professional services.
And you know, when clients purchase mediation services, it's quite simple.
If you want clients to trust you enough to use you, don't bother telling them how good you are - that your resolution rate is 99%, that you are a 'high rolling, high stakes mediator' - instead worry about them and their baby....[want to know more?... then watch here]
I left a comment asking David;
"....do things change when we are selling TO professional services firms, like lawyers.
I am a commercial mediator (ex NZ big law) and now I call the law firms, and specific attorneys within them, my clients.
Anything different in this situation or is it still all about the baby...?"
I will let you know if he answers.
Posted by Geoff Sharp 0 comments
CEDR and ACID are collaborating to deliver a mediation theatre.
Experience the dynamics of mediation through a live demonstration, with commentary provided by an experienced CEDR mediator.
There will be two theatres both using IP case studies – one with legal representation and one without.
Hey man, sounds like fun!
Date: Wednesday 17 October 2007
Registration 4.30
Where? The UK Intellectual Property Office, Harmsworth House, Bouverie Street, London
Contact: Faith Hardman at fhardman@cedr.com
Posted by Geoff Sharp 0 comments
Labels: mediation news
I'm not sure that you would find this in an accounting text book but my theory has always been that there's as much in the when and how you invoice, as in what you invoice.
The When?...
Posted by Geoff Sharp 0 comments
Labels: practise/practice
Jim Melamed's tribute today to How Mediate.com Helps Mediators is well deserved.
Now in its 12th year Mediate.com is averaging over 15,000 daily visitors, and traffic is growing at a rate of 35% annually.
What's more Mediate.com is #1 for "mediation" at Google and offers mediators and the public over 3,000 articles and resources free of charge.
Long before the rest of us spotted the power of the Internet for our field, James Melamed and John Helie were there, building an asset that is now so central to hundreds of successful mediation practices.
As Jim says 'these are meaningful accomplishments'
Posted by Geoff Sharp 0 comments
Labels: good mediation stuff on the net
Although it's gobbledygook to me, I suspect our US based friends may have an interest in the Structured Settlements 4Real Blog
It claims to 'present real and relevant information about structured settlements and settlement planning issues affecting parties in claims or litigation' but it also seems to do a fairly good job at bagging the opposition with posts like;
'...To the scum that wrote the piece for Structured Settlement-Quotes.com... Structured Settlement-Quotes.com cannot deliver legitimate structured settlement quotes. The company name structured settlement-quotes.com is misleading.'
But take a look at more constructive recent posts like Don't Blow All Your Hard Work At Mediation With "Cookie Cutter" Documentation
Posted by Geoff Sharp 0 comments
Labels: good mediation stuff on the net
... at least according to these folk at the sharp end;
Marie1958 says yesterday over at LA Legal that...
"Court ordered mediation should be taken out of our judicial system. It is a legal form of verbal and emotional abuse.
It should be abolished from our legal system. When all it causes is pain and emotional despair, what is the point... When our court system does not understand what goes on outside of the court room, and in everyday life.
Mediation is just a legal way for a very angry person to be able to force another person to be hurt, degraded and demean another. Mediation is a legal form of emotional and mental cruelty..." [I have tidied up the spelling but read more here]
And this from a Katrina survivor;
Posted by Geoff Sharp 4 comments
Labels: good mediation stuff on the net
Gregorio Billikopf from the University of California has generously advised that he has a limited number of free copies of his book Helping Others Resolve Differences to give away!
To obtain a copy just send: 1) $1.99 worth of USA stamps (it has to be stamps), and 2) a label with your mailing address. UC provides the envelope.
Send the stamps and return label to:
Helping Others Resolve Differences, c/o Gregorio Billikopf, University of California, 3800 Cornucopia Way # A, Modesto, CA 95358-9492
Free books are only available inside the US but those of us offshore can download it for free as a PDF file.
You can also get free sound resources from Gregorio Billikopf like this one hour empathic skills seminar or this interpersonal negotiation skills seminar.
Many thanks to Colm Brannigan of Ontario for sending this my way and if you wanted to do the right thing like your Mum/Mom taught you, send an email thanking Gregorio to gebillikopf@ucdavis.edu
Posted by Geoff Sharp 0 comments
Labels: good mediation stuff on the net, learning
Open-access journals all the rage and this is the open access journal of the Society for Judgment and Decision Making.
It's a 2007 web publication and will appear 6 times a year with no access charge - for the moment anyway.
There are already 5 publications available. It won't be every one's cup of tea with titles like Now you see it now you don't: The effectiveness of the recognition heuristic for selecting stocks...huh?
But articles like these may be of more interest, if a little dense (but maybe get your computer to read them to you); Gender differences in risk assessment: Why do women take fewer risks than men?
Posted by Geoff Sharp 1 comments
Labels: good mediation stuff on the net, learning
In the latest volume of ABA's DR Magazine lurks an interesting and well thought out article.
The Din of Many Voices: news coverage, the expansion of discourse, and conflict by Philip Seib of USC's School of Journalism examines the media's discourse around conflict, in particular across the vast ocean of the blogosphere, and how those of us in the DR business might manage this environment.
Seib says;
"... bloggers represent one of the most significant new facets of conflict-related discourse. They, along with other Internet-based communicators, provide many of the new voices and viewpoints that have emerged within the past few years... From an academic standpoint, the blogosphere is intriguing in terms of agenda setting. As blogs become more widely read, their influence may increase, affecting how the public aligns its issues priorities...."
Sorry no link - if you are not an ABA D/R section member, a copy of the magazine may be obtained for $8.00 from the ABA service center at service@abanet.org
Posted by Geoff Sharp 0 comments
Labels: good mediation stuff on the net
"The physician's belief in the treatment and the patient's faith in the physician exert a mutually reinforcing effect; the result is a powerful remedy that is almost guaranteed to produce an improvement and sometimes a cure" Skrabanek and McCormick, Follies and Fallacies in Medicine, p. 13.
Sometimes, like today, my job is simply to convene - the parties will do the rest.
The trick is to recognise what the prime role is on any given day - then to stay out of the way.
Gary Fitzpatrick taught me that.
Posted by Geoff Sharp 0 comments
Labels: reflection
Finally the wrapper has come off a unique global mediation resource sponsored by the UK Government for governments, courts, businesses, lawyers, mediators, and NGOs...
Welcome to Mediation World
The site needs country content urgently so if you want to be involved and keep your country's page updated, then apply to become a Country Representative by emailing to info@mediationworld.net
Sponsors behind the site are the UK's Department for Constitutional Affairs and Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Mediation World offers • Free access to mediation developments around the world – news, articles, mediation organisations, legislation, court schemes • Free information on each country, regularly updated by leading mediation representatives in that country • Free access to a discussion forum which enables you to post questions or comments and interact with others around the world on key issues – simply register your e-mail address on the home page • Free automatic notification of news and updates on the site - simply register your e-mail address on the home page
Posted by Geoff Sharp 0 comments
Posted by Geoff Sharp 0 comments
Labels: good mediation stuff on the net
This piece over at Trial Lawyer Resource Center Group Blog on Friday may be of interest to those involved in negotiating insurance cases.
Posted by Geoff Sharp 0 comments
Labels: good mediation stuff on the net
Posted by Geoff Sharp 2 comments
Labels: practise/practice, reflection
Prof. John Wade's latest article on Persuasion in Negotiation and Mediation is fresh out today.
Typically, it's 30 something pages are brimming with generous take-aways.
John provides a framework for common patterns of behaviour and persuasion observed in high conflict negotiations in civil and family disputes, often including legal representatives.
The article sets out:
• Some introductory boundaries to the topic of “persuasion”
• A composite model of a persuasive lawyer – negotiator
• Basic negotiation patterns
• The task of creating doubt about rights, goals and power
• Cialdini’s sales levers
• Persuasion and pause
• A glimpse at deception of others during negotiation
• A glimpse at deception of self and “decision traps”.
• Persuasion via “intangibles” – procedural skill and emotional awareness.
Posted by Geoff Sharp 0 comments
Labels: good mediation stuff on the net, learning
Now that mediators have mastered blogs, podcasts and videoblogs, we are ready to move on to host our very own talk back radio show.
BlogTalkRadio takes blogging to the next level, allowing bloggers to host a live blog show online. It's free to both radio show hosts and listeners and makes an exciting extension to the plain old text blog.
You can schedule your show up to a month in advance and listeners tune in live from the BlogTalkRadio site.
For those who want to phone in, just dial the phone number (by Skype if you want) that appears on the Programming Guide and you will be automatically placed in a queue where you are visible on the host's computer. When the host takes your call, you will be live and on the air!
BlogTalkRadio has more than 17,000 broadcasts under its belt and now carries an average of 200 shows per day, sometimes with 20 on air at once.
BTW#1, one of my IAM colleagues, Doug Noll is launching his own Internet radio show on World Talk Radio in September. World Talk Radio is a slightly different concept from BlogTalkRadio but is another viable option.
Doug's show is called Fix Your Conflicts! and he is looking looking for interesting mediator guests to talk about their practice. I will post when he is about to do his first show so we can all tune in.
BTW#2, take a look at Doug's blog that started back in May this year - Ataraxis: Solutions for Peace in Your Life; observations and lessons from a court room warrior turned peacemaker about finding peace in everyday life
Posted by Geoff Sharp 3 comments
Labels: good mediation stuff on the net
The new ethics committee of the ABA Dispute Resolution Section has just issued its first opinion.
The Committee opines that an attorney-mediator who learned information during a mediation that could be relevant to a discovery request in an unrelated litigation being handled by the mediator's law partner, should not disclose that information to the partner.
The Committee issued its opinion here; that since Standard V of the Model Standards of Conduct for Mediators requires mediators to maintain the confidentiality of information learned in mediation, absent a law mandating disclosure or the parties' agreement, disclosure of the confidential information would present an ethical problem [read more at ADRWorld.com - subscription needed]
Many thanks to New York attorney/mediator David White of White & Associates for the link.
Posted by Geoff Sharp 0 comments
Labels: ethics by Kim Kovach, mediation news
This piece from the latest edition of The Negotiation Times is worth a read as you start your week because it looks at how conflict arises at the table (as distinct from the substantive conflict the people are there for).
This kind of fits with my experience - that the chemistry on the day is every bit (more some days) as important - as to whether a consensus is possible - as the relative merits of each side's position.
"There are two ways to view how conflict can arise during a negotiation...
1. A negotiator's internal state will directly affect the interaction between the parties at the negotiation table.
2. The interaction that occurs at the table, will have a direct affect on the negotiating parties.
A conflict or dispute causes us to become defensive or offensive... Our reaction as people is complex... Here are some of the most prevalent of the defence mechanisms, used by negotiators in a conflict setting...." [read more]
Posted by Geoff Sharp 1 comments
Labels: good mediation stuff on the net, learning
Following on from my recent post about mediation parties blogging....
Cory of Landover Hills, Maryland writes;
"So ... I'm typing this blog while in the middle of mediation. Yep ... that's right mediation. This is the time in which parents try to make their own decisions about the fate of their children before the judge has to do so. And I've got to tell you ... " [it gets nasty after that so no need for a link me thinks]
And you really must read this blow by blow post of a mediation between well known blogger Penelope Trunk, of Brazen Careerist and her husband of 15 years;
"...I explain how my career is going great. I tell the mediator I have a busy speaking schedule and a six-figure contract for my next book. I even talk about my blog, and the estimated 450,000 page views a month, even though you can trust me on this: Our divorce mediator from Middleton, Wisconsin does not read blogs.
At this point, I think my husband is going to tell the mediator about how he gave up his career for the kids and me and he is totally disappointed. But instead he says to me, “A lot of people I talk with say that I am being abused by you.”
I am shocked. It’s a big allegation. But I say, “A lot of people I talk with think I should get rid of you.”
That’s as bad as it gets, right there. Because the mediator interjects..." [read more]
Take some time to scroll down the many comments - there are even some from other mediators!
Where's all this going?
Thanks to Stephanie West Allen who kindly pointed me to Penelope Trunk's post
Posted by Geoff Sharp 0 comments
Labels: good mediation stuff on the net, learning, reflection
By the time I finished my law degree in the early 80's I was outta there.
As I passed through Victoria University's gates one last time, I shouted over my shoulder that they should put my LLB in the post - they could find me at the beach.
I always regretted that.
When I eventually came back from the beach and got a job, my firm sponsored me for the wonderful Massey University Post Graduate Diploma in Dispute Resolution (GradDipBusStuds)....20 years of off and on study - nights when the kids were babies, lunchtimes in the firm cafe - but life got busy and I left off with one subject to go.
When I finally got back to it last year and finished the missing paper I was set on a front row seat at November's graduation ceremony.
Beaming with pride I submitted an application to register for graduation and reserved six seats (Susan, the kids, my Mum and Dad - I was forcing them all to come). I even booked my academic garb - stole, trencher - all the trimmings.
That was until a Dear Geoffrey letter arrived in late July declining graduation and advising I had for some reason completed paper 155.301 back in the early '90's that didn't count.
What I actually needed was 153.202....law and mediation! Law and what!
Post scriptum: With the assistance of my mediator colleagues and friends at Massey's Graduate School of Business Myles Stilwell and Virginia Goldblatt I hope to be in seats AA 12 - 17 on November 30 at 2pm!
Posted by Geoff Sharp 1 comments
Labels: practise/practice, schtick
With all the talk lately of jurors blogging - like in this California Court of Appeals case where a juror's blog resulted in the conviction and sentence of 36 years being voided - I got to wondering if parties to mediation are doing the same thing.
And guess what? They sure are. Especially those mediating because of marriage breakdown.
This yesterday at MySpace;
"Gratuitous Update. Current mood: busy
... I was sitting in mediation with him, his attorney, my attorney, and the mediator, all of whom know about "it" and they were all calmly discussing what was going to happen with the kids. I just remember one thought popping into my head: "If you aren't outraged, you're not paying attention." That pretty much sums this up...if you aren't outraged, you really don't know what's going on...and once everything comes out then I will share it all with you..." [read more]
And this again at MySpace;
"what the sh*t. Current mood: enraged
Monday I had the mediation for the divorce and I was confident that I was going to go in there and at minimal come out with a couple of alteration of my choosing and at least the same overnights with my children...The mediator continue to go back and forth taking everything that I proposed to allow her more recreational time and fighting that is great for the kids but would continue to say that it is best for me that we leave it at that and that would allow me time to myself and so on and so forth. The mediator would not attempt to show that my request for Thursday night was a valid point to be a better father with more school contact..." [read more]
This IP mediation at The Village Idiot;
"Post Mediation
The mediation was a wash...
While we were almost able to come to an agreement wherein I signed something (which allowed me to state that I was NOT guilty of anything, and was ONLY signing a piece of paper to end this fiasco), we got hung up on them paying my legal costs, which they are unwilling to budge on. And so am I...
If I were not being sued by these bastards I might almost be flattered by all the skills they think I have.
The amended response from Qwest is in line with what I expected, a location in Minnesota.
Un-fucking-believable." [read more]
And there's plenty more.
My theory? I think we are seeing blogs being used as vehicles for venting.
That does not make the confidentiality issues raised any the less, but it does make sense... what do the books say to do when a party can't contain themselves at the table?...ask them to 'just write it down for the moment and we'll get to it'
In fact one of the posts has this apology tagged on to the end of it;
"Sorry for the venting but just needed to type out my frustration... I do not plan on proof reading this so may God forgive me for the wrongful things that were portrayed in this blog"
Interesting, no?
Posted by Geoff Sharp 4 comments
Labels: good mediation stuff on the net, learning, reflection
It should never darken the doors of a mediation room, but yesterday it did. [click on image]
A turgid Latin maxim...
And it wasn't something simple like in rem or caveat emptor - it was... well I'm not sure what it was. So I faked it. Again.
Here is a handy little legal Latin cheat sheet from UK booksellers swarb.co.uk to stop mediators ever looking stupid again.
Posted by Geoff Sharp 1 comments
Labels: good mediation stuff on the net, learning
SAGE is offering free online full text access to the current and back issues of the following journals for a two month period, ending 30 September.
I have highlighted those in the list that may be of interest to readers of this blog;
Posted by Geoff Sharp 0 comments
Labels: good mediation stuff on the net
Well, this looked a good story for a Monday
Posted by Geoff Sharp 0 comments
Labels: schtick
Law.com reports last week;
"Cybersettle, which allows for the negotiation of settlements over the Internet, has signed a new three-year contract with New York City, expanding the types of cases that may be submitted to its system. The new eligible cases include medical malpractice and subrogation claims...
Since 2004, the city has used Cybersettle to attempt to resolve auto accident, sidewalk and other personal injury claims. Under Cybersettle's format, the city and its adversaries submit offers and demands confidentially over the Internet, and whenever an offer exceeds the demand a settlement is reached, with the plaintiff getting a bonus of half the difference between its demand and the city's higher offer. If the city's offer does not meet the plaintiff's demand, the two sides have the option of going to another round of bidding.
In a ruling last week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled in Cybersettle v. National Arbitration Forum, 1092-07, that Cybersettle's patent protects its system of allowing multiple bidding rounds"
Still scoff at the suggestion that a mediator machine will take your place in years to come?
Well, look at the little ticker under the photo at the Cybersettle homepage that gives latest settlement amounts with time and dates...
Posted by Geoff Sharp 0 comments
Labels: mediation news
I briefly touched on Harvard's Third Side Project a while back.
3S truly is worth an in-depth look.
Perhaps meant more for the consumer than the professional neutral, this website is nevertheless a wonderful resource.
Take a poke around the awesome 3S website and even download some free wallet cards or a Third Side One Day Workshop (Download Facilitator's Guidebook / Download Participant's Guide).
Or perhaps try 3S tools.
Or even watch a video of William Ury addressing a conference on the role of The Third Side.
"The Third Side is a way of looking at the conflicts around us
from the larger perspective of the surrounding community"
Posted by Geoff Sharp 0 comments
Labels: good mediation stuff on the net, learning
A : Because the banana couldn't find a date
Posted by Geoff Sharp 0 comments
Labels: good mediation stuff on the net, learning
Well, I guess I needed a phone call like this today to keep my feet on the ground - especially after returning this morning from a tour of the country and three successful mediations under my belt.
At 4.41pm a lawyer rang to ask me if I was available for a mediation on 14 August but quickly went on to say that he 'hoped not' - as while his corporate client wished to appoint me and had instructed him to telephone, he had a strong preference for someone else!
Posted by Geoff Sharp 0 comments
Labels: schtick
Posted by Geoff Sharp 3 comments
Labels: practise/practice
Spotted by Christopher Annunziata in the August issue of The Metropolitan Corporate Counsel an article titled The Case For Mediation In The Defense Of Complex Commercial Litigation.
I'm not as polite as Chris...have a read of this, then read more nonsense here if you can take it;
"The Critical Importance Of Selecting A First-Rate Mediator...It is equally essential that the mediator be motivated by ego and additional fees to obtain a resolution... An effective incentive for a mediator is where an agreed upon significant bonus, in addition to the hourly fees, will be paid if the mediation results in a resolution.
Additionally, it is important to ensure that the mediator is willing to communicate to the parties that he or she is, in effect, functioning as an arm of the court at the outset, and is, thus, obligated to go to all necessary ends to resolve the matter.
An effective mediator exercising this role might threaten to report parties to the judge for non-cooperation (i.e., insistence on unrealistic resolution amounts), run the mediation for consecutive ten-hour days, or demand that parties bring in their respective CEOs to meet with him or her if the process gets bogged down" [my emphasis]
There is however some wisdom in the same issue at Strategies For Successful Interaction With ADR Neutrals
Posted by Geoff Sharp 7 comments
Labels: good mediation stuff on the net